I'm feeling like I'm in a bit of a rutt.
So, I've gotten to a point in my essay, and I just don't know where to go.
I've written the stuff on internet theory and Irving's background, but I'm struggling to pinpoint specific issues to analyse.
I might try and sit down with Mr Wright tomorrow and have a chat.
There was no point to this post, just a bit of a whinge and a potential solution.
Over and out.
Maybe analyse the way he misconstrues evidence? Like the way he takes evidence out of context, the way he changes the perspective of a piece of evidence, that kind of thing? That's most definately a trait of a flawed historian.
ReplyDelete