So today Mr Wright sort of polished my question with the help of the rest of the gang. The issue was that I said in my original question was a 'flawed historian' and while I can make this judgement in my project, it seems presumptuous to make this call straight of the bat. A valid and really useful point, thanks guys!
So the new question goes something like this:
Evaluate David Irving's use of the internet for historical publication
This question is great because he allows me to cover all the bases I want to, leaving me the room to cast any (objective) judgements I so desire.
So a great first lesson back, will post again with more research soon.
I think it's a really good question. It's written so simply it will make it easier to answer, and it's such a unique topic. Yay! :)
ReplyDeleteSelf, peer and teacher assessment all mentioned in one post! How cromulent.
ReplyDelete